↓ Skip to main content

Detecting heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-Seq data by non-negative matrix factorization

Overview of attention for article published in PeerJ, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting heterogeneity in single-cell RNA-Seq data by non-negative matrix factorization
Published in
PeerJ, January 2017
DOI 10.7717/peerj.2888
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xun Zhu, Travers Ching, Xinghua Pan, Sherman M. Weissman, Lana Garmire

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-Sequencing (scRNA-Seq) is a fast-evolving technology that enables the understanding of biological processes at an unprecedentedly high resolution. However, well-suited bioinformatics tools to analyze the data generated from this new technology are still lacking. Here we investigate the performance of non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) method to analyze a wide variety of scRNA-Seq datasets, ranging from mouse hematopoietic stem cells to human glioblastoma data. In comparison to other unsupervised clustering methods including K-means and hierarchical clustering, NMF has higher accuracy in separating similar groups in various datasets. We ranked genes by their importance scores (D-scores) in separating these groups, and discovered that NMF uniquely identifies genes expressed at intermediate levels as top-ranked genes. Finally, we show that in conjugation with the modularity detection method FEM, NMF reveals meaningful protein-protein interaction modules. In summary, we propose that NMF is a desirable method to analyze heterogeneous single-cell RNA-Seq data. The NMF based subpopulation detection package is available at: https://github.com/lanagarmire/NMFEM.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 26%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Computer Science 21 15%
Engineering 9 6%
Mathematics 8 6%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,945,367
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from PeerJ
#2,179
of 13,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,237
of 417,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PeerJ
#66
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.