You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A large-scale comparison of human-written versus ChatGPT-generated essays
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-023-45644-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steffen Herbold, Annette Hautli-Janisz, Ute Heuer, Zlata Kikteva, Alexander Trautsch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 4 | 21% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
| Scientists | 6 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 5 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 62 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#458,812
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#5,119
of 142,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,121
of 364,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#108
of 3,894 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,894 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.