↓ Skip to main content

Nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002878.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fransien M Struik, Yves Lacasse, Roger Goldstein, Huib A.M. Kerstjens, Peter J Wijkstra

Abstract

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) is effective in treating acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nocturnal non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (nocturnal-NIPPV) has been proposed as an intervention for stable hypercapnic patients with COPD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 79 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Sports and Recreations 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 20 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,167,042
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,328
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,757
of 149,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.