The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What do brain endocasts tell us? A comparative analysis of the accuracy of sulcal identification by experts and perspectives in palaeoanthropology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Anatomy, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/joa.13966 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicole Labra, Aurélien Mounier, Yann Leprince, Denis Rivière, Mélanie Didier, Eric Bardinet, Mathieu D. Santin, Jean François Mangin, Andréa Filippo, Lou Albessard‐Ball, Amélie Beaudet, Douglas Broadfield, Emiliano Bruner, Kristian J. Carlson, Zachary Cofran, Dean Falk, Emmanuel Gilissen, Aida Gómez‐Robles, Simon Neubauer, Alannah Pearson, Carolin Röding, Yameng Zhang, Antoine Balzeau |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 15% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#533,798
of 26,313,853 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Anatomy
#64
of 2,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,476
of 373,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Anatomy
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,313,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.