The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Permeability of Roads to Movement of Scrubland Lizards and Small Mammals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.12081 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
CHERYL S. BREHME, JEFF A. TRACEY, LEROY R. MCCLENAGHAN, ROBERT N. FISHER |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 45 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 14% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 118 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 48 | 20% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 3% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,824,150
of 26,080,506 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#1,425
of 4,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,283
of 211,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#16
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.