↓ Skip to main content

Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
107 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Lamé, Elisa Giulia Liberati, Aneurin Canham, Jenni Burt, Lisa Hinton, Tim Draycott, Cathy Winter, Francesca Helen Dakin, Natalie Richards, Lucy Miller, Janet Willars, Mary Dixon-Woods

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 14 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2024.
All research outputs
#620,085
of 26,130,653 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#215
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,938
of 371,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,130,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.