The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why is safety in intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring so hard? A qualitative study combining human factors/ergonomics and social science analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016144 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guillaume Lamé, Elisa Giulia Liberati, Aneurin Canham, Jenni Burt, Lisa Hinton, Tim Draycott, Cathy Winter, Francesca Helen Dakin, Natalie Richards, Lucy Miller, Janet Willars, Mary Dixon-Woods |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 21 | 19% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 23% |
| Scientists | 22 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#604,071
of 26,374,559 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#211
of 2,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,731
of 374,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.