↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etripamil Nasal Spray for the Acute Reduction of Rapid Ventricular Rate in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial…

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,712)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
55 news outlets
twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicenter, Phase 2, Randomized Controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etripamil Nasal Spray for the Acute Reduction of Rapid Ventricular Rate in Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (ReVeRA-201)
Published in
Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, November 2023
DOI 10.1161/circep.123.012567
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. John Camm, Jonathan P. Piccini, Marco Alings, Paul Dorian, Gilbert Gosselin, Marie-Claude Guertin, James E. Ip, Peter R. Kowey, Blandine Mondésert, Fransisco J. Prins, Jean-Francois Roux, Bruce S. Stambler, JWM van Eck, Nadea Al Windy, Nathalie Thermil, Silvia Shardonofsky, David B. Bharucha, Denis Roy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 25%
Unspecified 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 410. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#75,408
of 26,198,325 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
#6
of 1,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,297
of 366,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,198,325 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.