The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robotic Totally Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair: An Initial Experience with Cambridge Medical Robotics Versius
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1089/lap.2023.0282 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harish Bevinje Kakkilaya, Senthil Kumar Ganapathi, Pradeep Joshua Christopher, Jayadatt Pawar, Rajiv Maharaj, Rajapandian Subbiah, Sathiyamoorthy Rudhramoorthy, Palanivelu Chinnusamy |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2023.
All research outputs
#6,757,885
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques
#64
of 859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,671
of 371,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 859 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.