You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Markers of Celiac Disease and Gluten Sensitivity in Children with Autism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0066155 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nga M. Lau, Peter H. R. Green, Annette K. Taylor, Dan Hellberg, Mary Ajamian, Caroline Z. Tan, Barry E. Kosofsky, Joseph J. Higgins, Anjali M. Rajadhyaksha, Armin Alaedini |
| Abstract |
Gastrointestinal symptoms are a common feature in children with autism, drawing attention to a potential association with celiac disease or gluten sensitivity. However, studies to date regarding the immune response to gluten in autism and its association with celiac disease have been inconsistent. The aim of this study was to assess immune reactivity to gluten in pediatric patients diagnosed with autism according to strict criteria and to evaluate the potential link between autism and celiac disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 48 | 35% |
| Canada | 14 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 43 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 14% |
| Scientists | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 42 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 14 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 241. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2024.
All research outputs
#160,088
of 25,885,333 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,399
of 225,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#939
of 210,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#54
of 4,632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,885,333 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.