You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
49: USE OF SESSION-SPECIFIC HASHTAGS TO ENHANCE THE REACH OF THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS IN SOCIAL MEDIA
Critical Care Medicine, December 2016
Tamas Szakmany, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Alice Ackerman, Brendan Riordan, Mary Lough, Matthew Duprey, Kathryn Moore, Christopher Carroll
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||8||42%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||5||26%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||2||33%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||17%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||17%|
|Student > Master||1||17%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||3||50%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
of 24,811,594 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
of 9,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 427,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.