↓ Skip to main content

49

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
49
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1097/01.ccm.0000508767.99664.b3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Szakmany, Tamas, Harwayne-Gidansky, Ilana, Ackerman, Alice, Riordan, Brendan, Lough, Mary, Duprey, Matthew, Moore, Kathryn, Carroll, Christopher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,020,413
of 12,211,623 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#959
of 6,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,830
of 329,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#26
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,211,623 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.