You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
49: USE OF SESSION-SPECIFIC HASHTAGS TO ENHANCE THE REACH OF THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS IN SOCIAL MEDIA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, December 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1097/01.ccm.0000508767.99664.b3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tamas Szakmany, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Alice Ackerman, Brendan Riordan, Mary Lough, Matthew Duprey, Kathryn Moore, Christopher Carroll |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 50% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,141,541
of 23,978,545 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,242
of 9,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,425
of 423,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#33
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.