↓ Skip to main content

49: USE OF SESSION-SPECIFIC HASHTAGS TO ENHANCE THE REACH OF THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS IN SOCIAL MEDIA

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care Medicine, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
49: USE OF SESSION-SPECIFIC HASHTAGS TO ENHANCE THE REACH OF THE CRITICAL CARE CONGRESS IN SOCIAL MEDIA
Published in
Critical Care Medicine, December 2016
DOI 10.1097/01.ccm.0000508767.99664.b3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamas Szakmany, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Alice Ackerman, Brendan Riordan, Mary Lough, Matthew Duprey, Kathryn Moore, Christopher Carroll

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2017.
All research outputs
#2,013,463
of 17,363,630 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#1,708
of 8,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,930
of 365,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#41
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,363,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.