You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping anhedonia onto reinforcement learning: a behavioural meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-5380-3-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Quentin JM Huys, Diego A Pizzagalli, Ryan Bogdan, Peter Dayan |
| Abstract |
Depression is characterised partly by blunted reactions to reward. However, tasks probing this deficiency have not distinguished insensitivity to reward from insensitivity to the prediction errors for reward that determine learning and are putatively reported by the phasic activity of dopamine neurons. We attempted to disentangle these factors with respect to anhedonia in the context of stress, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BPD) and a dopaminergic challenge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Sweden | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 392 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 80 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Researcher | 47 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 8% |
| Other | 69 | 17% |
| Unknown | 73 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 139 | 34% |
| Neuroscience | 75 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 8% |
| Unknown | 91 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,952,374
of 25,378,284 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#38
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,785
of 209,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,378,284 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.