You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013795.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shahinoor Akter, Gillian Forbes, Martha Vazquez Corona, Suellen Miller, Fernando Althabe, Arri Coomarasamy, Ioannis D Gallos, Olufemi T Oladapo, Joshua P Vogel, Fabiana Lorencatto, Meghan A Bohren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
Researcher | 4 | 7% |
Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 17% |
Unknown | 30 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 13% |
Unspecified | 6 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 31 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#6,544,694
of 25,916,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,085
of 13,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,956
of 373,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,916,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.