The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phase I clinical trial of intracerebroventricular transplantation of allogeneic neural stem cells in people with progressive multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Stem Cell, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.stem.2023.11.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurizio A Leone, Maurizio Gelati, Daniela C Profico, Claudio Gobbi, Emanuele Pravatà, Massimiliano Copetti, Carlo Conti, Lucrezia Abate, Luigi Amoruso, Francesco Apollo, Rosario F Balzano, Ilaria Bicchi, Massimo Carella, Alessandro Ciampini, Carlo Colosimo, Paola Crociani, Giada D'Aloisio, Pietro Di Viesti, Daniela Ferrari, Danilo Fogli, Andrea Fontana, Domenico Frondizi, Valentina Grespi, Jens Kuhle, Antonio Laborante, Ivan Lombardi, Gianmarco Muzi, Francesca Paci, Giuliana Placentino, Teresa Popolizio, Claudia Ricciolini, Simonetta Sabatini, Giada Silveri, Cristina Spera, Daniel Stephenson, Giuseppe Stipa, Elettra Tinella, Michele Zarrelli, Chiara Zecca, Yendri Ventura, Angelo D'Alessandro, Luca Peruzzotti-Jametti, Stefano Pluchino, Angelo L Vescovi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% |
| United States | 8 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 106 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 64% |
| Scientists | 34 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2426. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,394
of 26,356,696 outputs
Outputs from Cell Stem Cell
#3
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59
of 390,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Stem Cell
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,356,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.