The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 347 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Payne, Aileen Clarke, Nadia Swann, Jackie van Dael, Natassia Brenman, Rebecca Rosen, Adam Mackridge, Lucy Moore, Asli Kalin, Emma Ladds, Nina Hemmings, Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt, Stuart Faulkner, Isabel Hanson, Sophie Spitters, Sietse Wieringa, Francesca H Dakin, Sara E Shaw, Joseph Wherton, Richard Byng, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 49 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Latvia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 214 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 71 | 20% |
| Scientists | 53 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 28% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1489. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,459
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 2,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182
of 391,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.