↓ Skip to main content

Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 2,550)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
169 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
317 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis
Published in
BMJ Quality & Safety, November 2023
DOI 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca Payne, Aileen Clarke, Nadia Swann, Jackie van Dael, Natassia Brenman, Rebecca Rosen, Adam Mackridge, Lucy Moore, Asli Kalin, Emma Ladds, Nina Hemmings, Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt, Stuart Faulkner, Isabel Hanson, Sophie Spitters, Sietse Wieringa, Francesca H Dakin, Sara E Shaw, Joseph Wherton, Richard Byng, Laiba Husain, Trisha Greenhalgh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 317 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 42%
Unspecified 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 26%
Unspecified 4 21%
Psychology 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1464. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,194
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#2
of 2,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167
of 351,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.