↓ Skip to main content

Investigating Europa’s Habitability with the Europa Clipper

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 1,268)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating Europa’s Habitability with the Europa Clipper
Published in
Space Science Reviews, November 2023
DOI 10.1007/s11214-023-01025-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven D. Vance, Kathleen L. Craft, Everett Shock, Britney E. Schmidt, Jonathan Lunine, Kevin P. Hand, William B. McKinnon, Elizabeth M. Spiers, Chase Chivers, Justin D. Lawrence, Natalie Wolfenbarger, Erin J. Leonard, Kirtland J. Robinson, Marshall J. Styczinski, Divya M. Persaud, Gregor Steinbrügge, Mikhail Y. Zolotov, Lynnae C. Quick, Jennifer E. C. Scully, Tracy M. Becker, Samuel M. Howell, Roger N. Clark, Andrew J. Dombard, Christopher R. Glein, Olivier Mousis, Mark A. Sephton, Julie Castillo-Rogez, Francis Nimmo, Alfred S. McEwen, Murthy S. Gudipati, Insoo Jun, Xianzhe Jia, Frank Postberg, Krista M. Soderlund, Catherine M. Elder

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 10%
Engineering 2 10%
Chemistry 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 152. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2024.
All research outputs
#293,768
of 26,781,404 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#11
of 1,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,943
of 404,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,781,404 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.