↓ Skip to main content

Vector-Borne Disease in Wild Mammals Impacted by Urban Expansion and Climate Change

Overview of attention for article published in EcoHealth, November 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vector-Borne Disease in Wild Mammals Impacted by Urban Expansion and Climate Change
Published in
EcoHealth, November 2023
DOI 10.1007/s10393-023-01650-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Shultz, Andrés M. López-Pérez, Raina Jasuja, Sarah Helman, Katherine Prager, Amanda Tokuyama, Niamh Quinn, Danielle Bucklin, Jaime Rudd, Deana Clifford, Justin Brown, Seth Riley, Janet Foley

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 27 77%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 27 77%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#3,693,900
of 24,901,761 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#208
of 741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,215
of 170,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,901,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.