↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin D and Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
123 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
339 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin D and Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065835
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Bergman, Åsa U. Lindh, Linda Björkhem-Bergman, Jonatan D. Lindh

Abstract

Low levels of 25-OH vitamin D are associated with respiratory tract infection (RTI). However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconclusive. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the preventive effect of vitamin D supplementation on RTI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 377 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 49 13%
Student > Master 45 12%
Researcher 43 11%
Other 38 10%
Student > Postgraduate 25 6%
Other 88 23%
Unknown 97 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 4%
Other 42 11%
Unknown 113 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#183,713
of 25,904,557 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,726
of 225,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,100
of 210,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 4,632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,904,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.