You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Y-shape connection device for pediatric patients with an indwelling catheter (Dia = 8Fr) during urodynamic studies, especially for filling phase measurements: a single-center prospective study for safety and effectiveness
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Pediatrics, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fped.2023.1271417 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shi-Qin Yang, Xiao Zeng, Liao Peng, Si-Hong Shen, Jie Zhang, Zhi-Hui Huang, Hong Shen, De-yi Luo, Tao Jin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#21,205,114
of 26,038,372 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#4,275
of 7,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,915
of 366,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Pediatrics
#120
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,038,372 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.