You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The efficacy of Prrrikweg® gel in the treatment of insect bites: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, January 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00449688 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Hill, C. Stam, R. A. van Haselen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 6 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,150,599
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#228
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,651
of 80,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them