You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
MF59®-Adjuvanted H5N1 Vaccine Induces Immunologic Memory and Heterotypic Antibody Responses in Non-Elderly and Elderly Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angelika Banzhoff, Roberto Gasparini, Franco Laghi-Pasini, Tommaso Staniscia, Paolo Durando, Emanuele Montomoli, Pamela Capecchi, Pamela di Giovanni, Laura Sticchi, Chiara Gentile, Anke Hilbert, Volker Brauer, Sandrine Tilman, Audino Podda |
| Abstract |
Pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) has the potential to cause a major global pandemic in humans. Safe and effective vaccines that induce immunologic memory and broad heterotypic response are needed. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,517,982
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#43,571
of 193,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,365
of 170,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#149
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.