You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adaptive immune protection of the middle ears differs from that of the respiratory tract
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1288057 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kalyan K. Dewan, Amanda Caulfield, Yang Su, Colleen J. Sedney, Maiya Callender, Jillian Masters, Uriel Blas-Machado, Eric T. Harvill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2023.
All research outputs
#17,687,476
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#4,592
of 8,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,384
of 369,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#146
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.