The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Targeted therapies for lupus nephritis: Current perspectives and future directions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chinese Medical Journal, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002959 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiuzhi Jia, Yuewen Lu, Xunhua Zheng, Ruihan Tang, Wei Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 38% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,161,336
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Chinese Medical Journal
#86
of 2,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,682
of 199,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chinese Medical Journal
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,570 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.