You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
C–C Bond Cleavage at the N-α Position Enabled by the Low-potential Electrochemical Oxidation of the 2,7-Dimethoxynaphthyl Electroauxiliary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electrochemistry, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.5796/electrochemistry.23-67076 |
| Authors |
Kazuhiro OKAMOTO, Yasushi IMADA, Naoki SHIDA, Yoshikazu KITANO, Mahito ATOBE, Kazuhiro CHIBA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#15,535,325
of 25,944,331 outputs
Outputs from Electrochemistry
#181
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,898
of 374,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electrochemistry
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,944,331 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,658 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.