↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Genomic and Epigenomic Expression in Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Rett Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Genomic and Epigenomic Expression in Monozygotic Twins Discordant for Rett Syndrome
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miyake Kunio, Chunshu Yang, Yohei Minakuchi, Kenta Ohori, Masaki Soutome, Takae Hirasawa, Yasuhiro Kazuki, Noboru Adachi, Seiko Suzuki, Masayuki Itoh, Yu-ichi Goto, Tomoko Andoh, Hiroshi Kurosawa, Wado Akamatsu, Manabu Ohyama, Hideyuki Okano, Mitsuo Oshimura, Masayuki Sasaki, Atsushi Toyoda, Takeo Kubota

Abstract

Monozygotic (identical) twins have been widely used in genetic studies to determine the relative contributions of heredity and the environment in human diseases. Discordance in disease manifestation between affected monozygotic twins has been attributed to either environmental factors or different patterns of X chromosome inactivation (XCI). However, recent studies have identified genetic and epigenetic differences between monozygotic twins, thereby challenging the accepted experimental model for distinguishing the effects of nature and nurture. Here, we report the genomic and epigenomic sequences in skin fibroblasts of a discordant monozygotic twin pair with Rett syndrome, an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by autistic features, epileptic seizures, gait ataxia and stereotypical hand movements. The twins shared the same de novo mutation in exon 4 of the MECP2 gene (G269AfsX288), which was paternal in origin and occurred during spermatogenesis. The XCI patterns in the twins did not differ in lymphocytes, skin fibroblasts, and hair cells (which originate from ectoderm as does neuronal tissue). No reproducible differences were detected between the twins in single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), insertion-deletion polymorphisms (indels), or copy number variations. Differences in DNA methylation between the twins were detected in fibroblasts in the upstream regions of genes involved in brain function and skeletal tissues such as Mohawk Homeobox (MKX), Brain-type Creatine Kinase (CKB), and FYN Tyrosine Kinase Protooncogene (FYN). The level of methylation in these upstream regions was inversely correlated with the level of gene expression. Thus, differences in DNA methylation patterns likely underlie the discordance in Rett phenotypes between the twins.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 116 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 19%
Other 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 17 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Neuroscience 10 8%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2014.
All research outputs
#2,296,386
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,986
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,005
of 210,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#663
of 4,727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.