↓ Skip to main content

What Were You Thinking?: Individuals at Risk for Huntington Disease Talk About Having Children

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Genetic Counseling, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What Were You Thinking?: Individuals at Risk for Huntington Disease Talk About Having Children
Published in
Journal of Genetic Counseling, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10897-010-9312-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly A. Quaid, Melinda M. Swenson, Sharon L. Sims, Joan M. Harrison, Carol Moskowitz, Nonna Stepanov, Gregory W. Suter, Beryl J. Westphal, Huntington Study Group PHAROS Investigators and Coordinators

Abstract

Most of the research on reproduction in those at risk for Huntington Disease (HD) has focused on the impact of genetic testing on reproductive decision-making. The main goal has been to determine whether discovering one is a carrier of the HD mutation changes an individual's or couple's decision to start a family or to have more children. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine reproductive decision-making in a sample of individuals at risk for HD who have chosen not to pursue genetic testing. PHAROS (Prospective Huntington At Risk Observational Study) is a multi-site study that aims to establish whether experienced clinicians can reliably determine the earliest clinical symptoms of HD in a sample of individuals at 50% risk who have chosen not to pursue genetic testing. Data for this article were obtained from unstructured open ended qualitative interviews of a subsample of individuals participating in the PHAROS project. Interviews were conducted at six PHAROS research sites across the United States. In this paper, the research team used qualitative descriptive methods to construct and explore reproduction decision-making in three groups of people: 1) those who knew of their risk and decided to have children; 2) those who had children before they knew of their risk, and 3) those who chose not to have children based on their risk. We discuss the delicate balance health care professionals and genetic counselors must maintain between the benefits of providing hope and the dangers of offering unrealistic expectations about the time in which scientific advances actually may occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 20%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Unspecified 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Psychology 5 8%
Unspecified 5 8%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 14 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,579,567
of 25,482,409 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#552
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,116
of 103,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,482,409 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.