You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toward Reproducible Computational Research: An Empirical Analysis of Data and Code Policy Adoption by Journals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0067111 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Stodden, Peixuan Guo, Zhaokun Ma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 60% |
| Scientists | 24 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 19% |
| Researcher | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Librarian | 22 | 11% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 46 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Engineering | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 32% |
| Unknown | 26 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#545,423
of 24,978,429 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,523
of 216,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,818
of 202,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#197
of 4,713 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,978,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,713 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.