↓ Skip to main content

Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants.

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomised crossover study on pulse oximeter readings from different sensors in very preterm infants.
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, December 2023
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325961
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian Achim Maiwald, Christoph E Schwarz, Katrin Böckmann, Laila Springer, Christian F Poets, Axel Franz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,210,425
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#500
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,756
of 338,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.