↓ Skip to main content

A prospective evaluation of patients' health-related quality of life during auto-SCT: a 3-year follow-up

Overview of attention for article published in Bone Marrow Transplantation, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
A prospective evaluation of patients' health-related quality of life during auto-SCT: a 3-year follow-up
Published in
Bone Marrow Transplantation, November 2010
DOI 10.1038/bmt.2010.304
Pubmed ID
Authors

U Frödin, S Börjeson, J Lyth, K Lotfi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 43%
Researcher 2 29%
Professor 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#1,650,951
of 7,030,920 outputs
Outputs from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#521
of 1,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,010
of 89,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bone Marrow Transplantation
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,030,920 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.