You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using mice from different breeding sites fails to improve replicability of results from single-laboratory studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Lab Animal, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41684-023-01307-w |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ivana Jaric, Bernhard Voelkl, Irmgard Amrein, David P. Wolfer, Janja Novak, Carlotta Detotto, Ulrike Weber-Stadlbauer, Urs Meyer, Francesca Manuella, Isabelle M. Mansuy, Hanno Würbel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 7 | 13% |
United States | 7 | 13% |
Germany | 3 | 5% |
Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Croatia | 1 | 2% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 51% |
Scientists | 21 | 38% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,303,175
of 25,641,627 outputs
Outputs from Lab Animal
#21
of 878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,848
of 350,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lab Animal
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,641,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 878 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.