You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing levels of adaptive functioning: The Role Functioning Scale
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Community Mental Health Journal, April 1993
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00756338 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sherryl H. Goodman, Daniel R. Sewell, Eileen L. Cooley, Naomi Leavitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 64 | 43% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#386
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,975
of 21,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 21,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.