Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neurology, December 2023

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 7 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 1 Mendeley

Summary X

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 X posts from 7 X users, with an upper bound of 29,709 followers.

Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke patients eligible for thrombolysis: Background and purpose Automated perfusion imaging can detect stroke patients with…#Neurology https://t.co/g0c8w

31 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @FrontNeurol: New Research: Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke p…

31 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @FrontNeurol: New Research: Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke p…

30 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @FrontNeurol: New Research: Computed tomography hypoperfusion-hypodensity mismatch vs. automated perfusion mismatch to identify stroke p…

29 Dec 2023

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 3 additional X posts.