↓ Skip to main content

Depression and QOL in patients with ALS: how do self-ratings and ratings by relatives differ?

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depression and QOL in patients with ALS: how do self-ratings and ratings by relatives differ?
Published in
Quality of Life Research, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11136-010-9781-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Torsten Grehl, Mirjam Rupp, Paula Budde, Martin Tegenthoff, Heiner Fangerau

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 15%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Psychology 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,512,050
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#859
of 2,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,200
of 180,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,906 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.