↓ Skip to main content

Rationale and design of a multicentre, double-blind, prospective, randomized, European and Canadian study: evaluating patient outcomes and costs of managing adults with post-stroke focal spasticity.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rationale and design of a multicentre, double-blind, prospective, randomized, European and Canadian study: evaluating patient outcomes and costs of managing adults with post-stroke focal spasticity.
Published in
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, January 2011
DOI 10.2340/16501977-0663
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörgen Borg, Anthony B Ward, Jörg Wissel, Jai Kulkarni, Mohamed Sakel, Per Ertzgaard, Per Åkerlund, Iris Reuter, Christoph Herrmann, Lalith Satkunam, Theodore Wein, Isabelle Girod, Nicola Wright

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 135 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 9 7%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Neuroscience 9 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 41 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#483
of 1,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,810
of 190,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
#14
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.