↓ Skip to main content

Risk of travel-related cases of Zika virus infection is predicted by transmission intensity in outbreak-affected countries

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of travel-related cases of Zika virus infection is predicted by transmission intensity in outbreak-affected countries
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-1977-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas H. Ogden, Aamir Fazil, David Safronetz, Michael A. Drebot, Justine Wallace, Erin E. Rees, Kristina Decock, Victoria Ng

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection is emerging globally, currently causing outbreaks in the Caribbean, and Central and South America, and putting travellers to affected countries at risk. Model-based estimates for the basic reproduction number (R 0 ) of ZIKV in affected Caribbean and Central and South American countries, obtained from 2015 to 2016 human case surveillance data, were compared by logistic regression and Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC), with the prevalence of ZIKV-positive test results in Canadians who travelled to them. Estimates of R 0 for each country were a good predictor of the ZIKV test result (ROC area under the curve = 0.83) and the odds of testing positive was 11-fold greater for travellers visiting countries with estimated R 0  ≥ 2.76, compared to those visiting countries with R 0  < 2.76. Risk to travellers varies widely amongst countries affected by ZIKV outbreaks. Estimates of R 0 from surveillance data can assist in assessing levels of risk for travellers and may help improve travel advice. They may also allow better prediction of spread of ZIKV from affected countries by travellers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 24%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#15,437,553
of 22,947,506 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#3,398
of 5,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,983
of 419,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#67
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,947,506 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.