↓ Skip to main content

Correlates of tumor development in patients with myotonic dystrophy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlates of tumor development in patients with myotonic dystrophy
Published in
Journal of Neurology, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00415-012-6476-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maya Das, Richard T. Moxley III, James E. Hilbert, William B. Martens, Lisa Letren, Mark H. Greene, Shahinaz M. Gadalla

Abstract

Patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM) have recently been reported to be at increased risk of tumor development, but clinical associations related to this observation are unknown. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) of self-reported tumor development by patients' demographic and clinical characteristics to evaluate factors associated with tumor development in DM patients, using data from the National Registry of Myotonic Dystrophy and Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy Patients and Family Members. Of the 911 participants, 47.5 % were male and 85.7 % had DM type 1 (DM1). Compared to DM1, patients with DM type 2 (DM2) were older at registry enrollment (median age 55 vs. 44 years, p < 0.0001) and at DM diagnosis (median age 48 vs. 30 years, p < 0.0001); and more likely to be females (p = 0.001). At enrollment, 95 (10.4 %) DM patients reported a history of benign or malignant tumor. Tumors were associated with female gender (OR 1.9, 95 % CI 1.2-3.1, p = 0.007) and DM1 (OR 2.1, 95 % CI 1.1-4.1, p = 0.03). In a subgroup analysis of patients with blood-based DNA testing results (397 DM1, 54 DM2), repeat expansion size was not associated with tumor risk in DM1 (p = 0.26) or DM2 (p = 0.34). In conclusion, female gender and DM1 subtype, but not DNA repeat expansion size, were associated with increased risk of tumors in DM. Follow-up studies are warranted to determine if oncogenes associated with dystrophia myotonica-protein kinase are altered in DM, and to determine if repeat expansion size, as in our study, is not associated with tumor development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,605
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#3,625
of 4,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,514
of 164,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#38
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.