Borrelia burgdorferi
Springer US
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Constructing an ELISA for Detection of Anti-Borrelia in Wildlife and Agricultural Animals
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 4 |
| Book title |
Borrelia burgdorferi
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-0716-3561-2_4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-07-163560-5, 978-1-07-163561-2
|
| Authors |
Bland, Julia, McGowan, Caitlin, Bush, Emma, Lloyd, Vett |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,644,587
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#8,941
of 14,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,973
of 307,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#217
of 271 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,192 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 271 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.