↓ Skip to main content

A Global Trend towards the Loss of Evolutionarily Unique Species in Mangrove Ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Global Trend towards the Loss of Evolutionarily Unique Species in Mangrove Ecosystems
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0066686
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barnabas H. Daru, Kowiyou Yessoufou, Ledile T. Mankga, T. Jonathan Davies

Abstract

The mangrove biome stands out as a distinct forest type at the interface between terrestrial, estuarine, and near-shore marine ecosystems. However, mangrove species are increasingly threatened and experiencing range contraction across the globe that requires urgent conservation action. Here, we assess the spatial distribution of mangrove species richness and evolutionary diversity, and evaluate potential predictors of global declines and risk of extinction. We found that human pressure, measured as the number of different uses associated with mangroves, correlated strongly, but negatively, with extinction probability, whereas species ages were the best predictor of global decline, explaining 15% of variation in extinction risk. Although the majority of mangrove species are categorised by the IUCN as Least Concern, our finding that the more threatened species also tend to be those that are more evolutionarily unique is of concern because their extinction would result in a greater loss of phylogenetic diversity. Finally, we identified biogeographic regions that are relatively species-poor but rich in evolutionary history, and suggest these regions deserve greater conservation priority. Our study provides phylogenetic information that is important for developing a unified management plan for mangrove ecosystems worldwide.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 200 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 13 6%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 80 39%
Environmental Science 61 30%
Unspecified 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 42 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2013.
All research outputs
#4,399,190
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#60,530
of 193,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,058
of 196,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,204
of 4,692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.