The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk assessment in pT1 colorectal cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Clinical Pathology, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.1136/jcp-2023-208803 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Emma Jane Norton, Adrian C Bateman |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
United States | 3 | 8% |
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 27 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 16% |
Scientists | 6 | 16% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,688,623
of 26,368,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#103
of 4,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,995
of 390,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Pathology
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,368,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.