↓ Skip to main content

FioSchisto’s expert perspective on implementing WHO guidelines for schistosomiasis control and transmission elimination in Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in immunology, December 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FioSchisto’s expert perspective on implementing WHO guidelines for schistosomiasis control and transmission elimination in Brazil
Published in
Frontiers in immunology, December 2023
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1268998
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camilla Almeida Menezes, Langia Colli Montresor, Soraya Torres Gaze Jangola, Aline Carvalho de Mattos, Ana Lúcia Coutinho Domingues, Arnaldo Maldonado Júnior, Clélia Christina Mello Silva, Constança Simões Barbosa, Cristiane Lafetá Furtado de Mendonça, Cristiano Lara Massara, Cristina Toscano Fonseca, Edward José de Oliveira, Elainne Christine de Souza Gomes, Elizângela Feitosa da Silva, Fernando Schemelzer de Moraes Bezerra, Floriano Paes Silva-Jr, Isadora Cristina de Siqueira, José Roberto Machado e Silva, Leo Heller, Leonardo Paiva Farias, Lilian C. Nobrega Holsbach Beck, Mariana Cristina Silva Santos, Mariana Gomes Lima, Marina de Moraes Mourão, Martin Johannes Enk, Monica Ammon Fernandez, Naftale Katz, Omar dos Santos Carvalho, Patrícia Martins Parreiras, Renata Heisler Neves, Sandra Grossi Gava, Sheilla Andrade de Oliveira, Silvana Carvalho Thiengo, Tereza Cristina Favre, Carlos Graeff-Teixeira, Otávio Sarmento Pieri, Roberta Lima Caldeira, Rosiane A. da Silva-Pereira, Roberto Sena Rocha, Ricardo Riccio Oliveira

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 12 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 13 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,666,349
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in immunology
#10,918
of 32,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,808
of 371,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in immunology
#209
of 1,054 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,651 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,054 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.