↓ Skip to main content

Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Human Reproduction Update, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,086)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Declining global fertility rates and the implications for family planning and family building: an IFFS consensus document based on a narrative review of the literature
Published in
Human Reproduction Update, January 2024
DOI 10.1093/humupd/dmad028
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bart C J M Fauser, G David Adamson, Jacky Boivin, Georgina M Chambers, Christian de Geyter, Silke Dyer, Marcia C Inhorn, Lone Schmidt, Gamal I Serour, Basil Tarlatzis, Fernando Zegers-Hochschild, Oladapo Ashiru, Simon Brown, Karianne Bye, Carlos Calhaz-Jorge, Barbara Collura, Petra De Sutter, Luca Gianaroli, Linda Giudice, Osamu Ishihara, Edgar V Mocanu, Willem Ombelet, Rishma Pai, Guido Pennings, James Raymer, Hugh Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 64 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 14%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 26 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 29 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2024.
All research outputs
#305,538
of 26,200,644 outputs
Outputs from Human Reproduction Update
#27
of 1,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,784
of 374,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Reproduction Update
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,200,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them