You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What should be done about policy on alcohol pricing and promotions? Australian experts’ views of policy priorities: a qualitative interview study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-610 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea S Fogarty, Simon Chapman |
Abstract |
Alcohol policy priorities in Australia have been set by the National Preventative Health Task Force, yet significant reform has not occurred. News media coverage of these priorities has not reported public health experts as in agreement and Government has not acted upon the legislative recommendations made. We investigate policy experts' views on alcohol policy priorities with a view to establishing levels of accord and providing suggestions for future advocates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 4 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
India | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 18% |
Student > Master | 11 | 15% |
Researcher | 8 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,007,662
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,443
of 16,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,659
of 200,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#62
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.