↓ Skip to main content

Fragility of randomised controlled trials for systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Lupus Science & Medicine, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fragility of randomised controlled trials for systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis therapies
Published in
Lupus Science & Medicine, January 2024
DOI 10.1136/lupus-2023-001068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel Figueroa-Parra, Michael S Putman, Cynthia S Crowson, Alí Duarte-García

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,781,834
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from Lupus Science & Medicine
#97
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,061
of 261,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lupus Science & Medicine
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,806 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.