You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“Salvage Microbiology”: Detection of Bacteria Directly from Clinical Specimens following Initiation of Antimicrobial Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0066349 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John J. Farrell, Rangarajan Sampath, David J. Ecker, Robert A. Bonomo |
Abstract |
PCR coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) is a diagnostic approach that has demonstrated the capacity to detect pathogenic organisms from culture negative clinical samples after antibiotic treatment has been initiated. [1] We describe the application of PCR/ESI-MS for detection of bacteria in original patient specimens that were obtained after administration of antibiotic treatment in an open investigation analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 57% |
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Sweden | 1 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 16 | 17% |
Student > Master | 16 | 17% |
Other | 10 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Professor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,018,045
of 22,712,476 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,870
of 193,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,868
of 196,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,532
of 4,711 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,712,476 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,711 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.