↓ Skip to main content

National-scale remotely sensed lake trophic state from 1984 through 2020

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Data, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
69 X users

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National-scale remotely sensed lake trophic state from 1984 through 2020
Published in
Scientific Data, January 2024
DOI 10.1038/s41597-024-02921-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael F. Meyer, Simon N. Topp, Tyler V. King, Robert Ladwig, Rachel M. Pilla, Hilary A. Dugan, Jack R. Eggleston, Stephanie E. Hampton, Dina M. Leech, Isabella A. Oleksy, Jesse C. Ross, Matthew R. V. Ross, R. Iestyn Woolway, Xiao Yang, Matthew R. Brousil, Kate C. Fickas, Julie C. Padowski, Amina I. Pollard, Jianning Ren, Jacob A. Zwart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 15%
Environmental Science 2 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#860,796
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#342
of 3,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,076
of 345,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#10
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.