The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the accuracy of OpenET satellite-based evapotranspiration data to support water resource and land management applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Water, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s44221-023-00181-7 |
| Authors |
John M. Volk, Justin L. Huntington, Forrest S. Melton, Richard Allen, Martha Anderson, Joshua B. Fisher, Ayse Kilic, Anderson Ruhoff, Gabriel B. Senay, Blake Minor, Charles Morton, Thomas Ott, Lee Johnson, Bruno Comini de Andrade, Will Carrara, Conor T. Doherty, Christian Dunkerly, MacKenzie Friedrichs, Alberto Guzman, Christopher Hain, Gregory Halverson, Yanghui Kang, Kyle Knipper, Leonardo Laipelt, Samuel Ortega-Salazar, Christopher Pearson, Gabriel E. L. Parrish, Adam Purdy, Peter ReVelle, Tianxin Wang, Yun Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 65 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 62% |
| Scientists | 29 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 136. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#318,294
of 26,184,649 outputs
Outputs from Nature Water
#29
of 218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,969
of 372,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Water
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,184,649 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.