You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013295.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Victoria N Gibbs, Rita Champaneria, Josie Sandercock, Nicky J Welton, Louise J Geneen, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Dorée, Catherine Kimber, Antony Jr Palmer, Lise J Estcourt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Estonia | 1 | 11% |
New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2024.
All research outputs
#6,790,268
of 26,124,608 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,305
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,853
of 367,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,124,608 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.