You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS): a quality scoring tool for radiomics research endorsed by EuSoMII
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-023-01572-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Burak Kocak, Tugba Akinci D’Antonoli, Nathaniel Mercaldo, Angel Alberich-Bayarri, Bettina Baessler, Ilaria Ambrosini, Anna E. Andreychenko, Spyridon Bakas, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Keno Bressem, Irene Buvat, Roberto Cannella, Luca Alessandro Cappellini, Armando Ugo Cavallo, Leonid L. Chepelev, Linda Chi Hang Chu, Aydin Demircioglu, Nandita M. deSouza, Matthias Dietzel, Salvatore Claudio Fanni, Andrey Fedorov, Laure S. Fournier, Valentina Giannini, Rossano Girometti, Kevin B. W. Groot Lipman, Georgios Kalarakis, Brendan S. Kelly, Michail E. Klontzas, Dow-Mu Koh, Elmar Kotter, Ho Yun Lee, Mario Maas, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Henning Müller, Nancy Obuchowski, Fanny Orlhac, Nikolaos Papanikolaou, Ekaterina Petrash, Elisabeth Pfaehler, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Andrea Ponsiglione, Sebastià Sabater, Francesco Sardanelli, Philipp Seeböck, Nanna M. Sijtsema, Arnaldo Stanzione, Alberto Traverso, Lorenzo Ugga, Martin Vallières, Lisanne V. van Dijk, Joost J. M. van Griethuysen, Robbert W. van Hamersvelt, Peter van Ooijen, Federica Vernuccio, Alan Wang, Stuart Williams, Jan Witowski, Zhongyi Zhang, Alex Zwanenburg, Renato Cuocolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 8 | 22% |
| United States | 4 | 11% |
| Ireland | 3 | 8% |
| Austria | 3 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 5% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 35% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 37% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,711,342
of 25,911,277 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#74
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,398
of 358,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,911,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.