↓ Skip to main content

Total HIV/AIDS Expenditures in Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province in 2010: The First Systematic Evaluation of Both Health and Non-Health Related HIV/AIDS Expenditures in China

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Total HIV/AIDS Expenditures in Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province in 2010: The First Systematic Evaluation of Both Health and Non-Health Related HIV/AIDS Expenditures in China
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0068006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Duo Shan, Jiangping Sun, Anna Yakusik, Zhongdan Chen, Jianhua Yuan, Tao Li, Jeannia Fu, Kaveh Khoshnood, Xing Yang, Mei Wei, Song Duan, Marc Bulterys, Michael Sante, Runhua Ye, Lifen Xiang, Yuecheng Yang

Abstract

We assessed HIV/AIDS expenditures in Dehong Prefecture, Yunnan Province, one of the highest prevalence regions in China, and describe funding sources and spending for different categories of HIV-related interventions and at-risk populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hong Kong 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,754,808
of 23,743,910 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#46,573
of 202,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,631
of 198,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,055
of 4,710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,743,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.