↓ Skip to main content

It’s All About Timing: Exploring Different Temporal Resolutions for Analyzing Digital-Phenotyping Data

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It’s All About Timing: Exploring Different Temporal Resolutions for Analyzing Digital-Phenotyping Data
Published in
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, January 2024
DOI 10.1177/25152459231202677
Authors

Anna M. Langener, Gert Stulp, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Andrea Costanzo, Raj R. Jagesar, Martien J. Kas, Laura F. Bringmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 56%
Unspecified 1 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#1,175,343
of 25,884,216 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#95
of 219 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,523
of 356,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,884,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.